Beast Rune Future?

Jowy Atreides · Post by **Jowy Atreides** » Thu Mar 24, 2005 3:17 pm

It isn't a theory, it's a fact.

True Wind Bearer · Post by **True Wind Bearer** » Thu Mar 24, 2005 7:53 pm

It is? How do we know that?
And what are did it attach itself to, is that known?

Jowy Atreides · Post by **Jowy Atreides** » Fri Mar 25, 2005 2:21 pm

Suikosource says that the Beast Rune's current location is unknown. So, it's official.

It's not known where it went, or whether it attached itself to something else. That was Reiken's assumption, as he clearly said.

highwind44029 · Post by **highwind44029** » Fri Mar 25, 2005 6:51 pm

I think TWB was referring to the last sentence quoted (that the Rune relocated itself) as the excellent theory, not the fact that the whereabouts of the Rune is unknown...

anokosa · Post by **anokosa** » Thu Dec 08, 2005 12:51 pm

but suikosource is not the official suikoden site, is it? wot if the beast rune just attached to pilika or jillia!?!?!?!? forget it, bad thought, not 2 mention scary!

Lemmy Claypool · Post by **Lemmy Claypool** » Thu Dec 08, 2005 2:48 pm

Not to mention that it isn't.

Angelis_Taleria · Post by **Angelis_Taleria** » Thu Dec 08, 2005 3:27 pm

anokosa wrote:but suikosource is not the official suikoden site, is it? wot if the beast rune just attached to pilika or jillia!?!?!?!? forget it, bad thought, not 2 mention scary!

It isn't the official Suikoden site, but the goal of the site is to house factual knowledge pertaining to the series and discuss this knowledge on the forums in a rational manner.

anokosa · Post by **anokosa** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 9:39 am

we dont know that. pilika or jillia havent been reshown yet, so we dont know that the beast rune didnt attach itself to one of them, as they were the closest people to jowy and l'renoulle. or to riou's army members. they were closest to it.

aydas_arrow · Post by **aydas_arrow** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 10:45 am

dont confuse all runes with the rune of punishment, that is the only know rune that will just attach itself to the closest person around. in theory the beast rune COULD be attached to jilia or pilika, but only if it deemed on of them a worth while host.

demon eye · Post by **demon eye** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 12:45 pm

Quick question: What would be the purpose of the Beast Rune attaching itself to Pilika or Jillia, both who have fled to Harmonia? If you aren't aware, the Beast Rune refused to be housed in Harmonia and forced Hikusaak to give it to the Blights to take residence in L'Renouille. And if that isn't enough, why didn't it attach itself to Luca of all people and then choose to attach itself to one of those young girls who literally hated blooshed?

It needs sacrifices to be fully unleashed. Now, what good would attaching itself to people who are basically pacifist in nature? Also, the Beast Rune appears to have never chosen a human host. It appears that it is much more comfortable with latching on to inanimate objects over being used by mortals. It just doesn't seem rather likely that it would go to one of those two.

ShardStar · Post by **ShardStar** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 12:59 pm

It's probably either gone ot a new location we have as yet to see or to a location that we've been to in the past that it could try to corrupt to it's own means.

Wraith · Post by **Wraith** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 1:10 pm

I just figured this out. Could it be possible for a true rune to attach itself to something (inanimate object or host) without actually showing any physical proof that it is there? Perhaps the Beast Rune has attached himself to a wolf (or a rock for that matter) without actually showing its symbol upon it.

ShardStar · Post by **ShardStar** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 1:35 pm

I don't know if the Rune can hide it's symbol or not, in alot of cases Hugo, Joshua, and Riou the Rune that they had could be seen. Not to mention the huge mural you see on the floor in S2 of the Beast Rune. I don't think it's in this Rune's mo to hide. Has it ever done so before?

aydas_arrow · Post by **aydas_arrow** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 3:23 pm

i didnt say the rune was attach to jillia or pilika, i was using them as an example to illistrate that the rune has a will of its own, and could attach itself to one of them if it wanted to, though in my opinion it isnt.